Unshakeable Trailer




Unshakeable Trailer



Check out the new fortune teller gospel tract!


You can download this for free at: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48875353/fortune-gospel.zip

Friday, March 14, 2014

Questions for Evolutionists

by Dr. Kent Hovind

The test of any theory is whether or not it provides answers to basic questions. Some well-meaning but misguided people think evolution is a reasonable theory to explain man’s questions about the universe. Evolution is not a good theory—it is just a pagan religion masquerading as science.

1. Where did the space for the universe come from?

2. Where did matter come from?

3. Where did the laws of the universe come from (gravity, inertia, etc.)?

4. How did matter get so perfectly organized?

5. Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?

6. When, where, why, and how did life come from dead matter?

7. When, where, why, and how did life learn to reproduce itself?

8. With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?

9. Why would any plant or animal want to reproduce more of its kind since this would only make more mouths to feed and decrease the chances of survival? (Does the individual have a drive to survive, or the species? How do you explain this?)

10. How can mutations (recombining of the genetic code) create any new, improved varieties? (Recombining English letters will never produce Chinese books.)

11. Is it possible that similarities in design between different animals prove a common Creator instead of a common ancestor?

12. Natural selection only works with the genetic information available and tends only to keep a species stable. How would you explain the increasing complexity in the genetic code that must have occurred if evolution were true?

13. When, where, why, and how did: a) Single-celled plants become multicelled? (Where are the two- and three celled intermediates?) b) Single-celled animals evolve? c) Fish change to amphibians? d) Amphibians change to reptiles? e) Reptiles change to birds? (The lungs, bones, eyes, reproductive organs, heart, method of locomotion, body covering, etc., are all very different!) How did the intermediate forms live?

14. When, where, why, how, and from what did: a) Whales evolve? b) Sea horses evolve? c) Bats evolve? d) Eyes evolve? e) Ears evolve? f) Hair, skin, feathers, scales, nails, claws, etc., evolve?

15. Which evolved first (how, and how long, did it work without the others)? a) The digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body’s resistance to its own digestive juice (stomach, intestines, etc.)? b) The drive to reproduce or the ability to reproduce? c) The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat, or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs? d) DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts? e) The termite or the flagella in its intestines that actually digest the cellulose? f) The plants or the insects that live on and pollinate the plants? g) The bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or muscles to move the bones? h) The nervous system, repair system, or hormone system? i) The immune system or the need for it?

[SOURCE]

Monday, March 10, 2014

New Graphic Covers for Unshakeable!

I have made cover graphics for my Unshakeable Course that is coming soon. Here's where you can see them, as well as some teasers of the course inside the pictures: http://oddinterviews.com/unshakeable/graphics/

The Unshakeable Course is coming soon!


COSMOS - A Religious Show

Yesterday, I saw the premiere of National Geographic's new series, "Cosmos, with Neil deGrasse Tyson." In one hour, the entire evolutionary story was told. I'll do the same here, only simplified. According to evolution, 13.7 billion years ago, there was nothing, which became a dot, which expanded into the universe. Then, 4.6 billion years ago, the earth formed out of a molten mass. It rained on the rocks for millions of years, turned them into soup, and the soup came alive 3 billion years ago. And since the soup came from rain and rocks, the ancestor of everyone alive today is a rock. Here's Grandpa!



And then man evolved 3 million years ago from apelike creatures, and here we are today. That's evolution in a nutshell. Neil gave absolutely no scientific evidence for evolution. He did try to give two "evidences" for the big bang, and just left that as evidence for the whole evolution story. This is why evolution needs to be defined properly. There are actually six different definitions of evolution.


What Niel did was give "evidence" for Cosmic Evolution, and implied that this was enough evidence for the others. Here are the two "evidences" he gave for Cosmic Evolution:

1. The amount of helium in the universe.
2. The Microwave background radiation.

I don't see how the amount of helium can't be explained by God's creation in the Bible, so that's not good evidence for the big bang. But the microwave background radiation is more interesting. Here is a picture of the background radiation throughout the universe:


This is supposedly the remnants of the explosion of the big bang. But scientific evidence shows otherwise. The microwave background radiation seems to be coming from all directions, not just one. If the big bang occurred, the radiation should only be coming from one direction - where the big bang (and the universe) started. It should also be a lot hotter than it currently is. If this is a result of the big bang, then the background radiation should be 100 degrees Kelvin. Instead, it's only 2.73 degrees Kelvin. That's 2.73% of what it should be. The background radiation could be caused by the radiation of all of the stars throughout the universe. This is not evidence for Cosmic evolution, and it's definitely not evidence for the other evolutions. Niel's program fails at showing scientific evidence for evolution, and is therefore religious.


Saturday, March 1, 2014

Unshakeable Course - NEW TRAILER!

Here's my latest trailer for the Unshakeable Course I'm coming out with soon.


Didn't men write the Bible? Is the Bible a big game of telephone? Is evolution scientific? What's the big bang? Are there lies in public school textbooks to support evolution? Did the Colorado River form the Grand Canyon over millions of years? Doesn't the geologic column prove the earth is millions of years old? Does similar DNA and morphology prove evolution? Is evolution guided by natural selection and mutations? Does lots of micro-evolution lead to macro-evolution over millions of years? Does the presence of gill-slits in all animal embryos prove that all animals evolved from fish? Are there vestigial organs, and do they prove evolution? What about "Lucy"? Are there any cave-men? Doesn't carbon dating prove the earth is millions of years old? What about K-Ar dating? Doesn't distant starlight prove an old universe? Is there any scientific evidence for a young earth, as described in the Bible? How did God originally create the world? Where do dinosaurs fit into the Bible? What caused the flood? Where did all the water from the flood go? What about fossils? Was the ark big enough to hold all of the animals in the world? Wouldn't the ark leak? How did Noah and his family get fresh air into the ark? Wouldn't the ark have capsized from the waves? Is God one person or three? Should Christians verbally share the gospel with others? How should Christians share the gospel biblically? Those are just some of the questions that will be effectively answered in the Unshakeable Course.

The Unshakeable Course will equip Christians to defend their faith against secular attacks in our current day and age. It will include video from:

• Dr. Kent Hovind - Founder of Creation Science Evangelism
• Eric Hovind - President of Creation Today
• Dr. Walt Brown - Director of the Center for Scientific Creation
• Brett Kunkle - Student Impact Director at Stand to Reason
• Dr. James White - Director of Alpha and Omega Ministries
• Ray Comfort - President and Founder of Living Waters Publications
• Kirk Cameron - Producer and Host of The Way of the Master
• Mark Spence - Dean of The School of Biblical Evangelism
• Ken Ham - President and Founder of Answers in Genesis
• Dr. Jason Lisle - Director of Research at the Institute for Creation Research

For more details, visit http://www.oddinterviews.com/unshakeable

Share this with the entire social media universe with the hashtag #unshakeable

Friday, February 28, 2014

Grandpa is Soup?

Like, Comment, Share.
In talking about how life originated according to evolution, one Biology book says,


"The first self-replicating systems must have emerged in this organic 'soup.'" ~ Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life by Wadsworth, 1992, p. 301.
So according to evolution, great-great-great-great-grandpa is soup.


Is this your grandpa?
Not to mention that no traces of that event remains. There isn't any evidence that this happened at all. It's not science. You can believe in it if you want, but just don't call it science, because it isn't. The Unshakeable Course will answer many claims made by evolutionists. Coming Soon at www.oddinterviews.com/unshakeable



Share with the hashtag #unshakeable throughout the entire social media universe.

Monday, February 24, 2014

Genesis 1 - Translation Issues

In Genesis chapter one, there are a few translation issues from the Hebrew to modern day English that needs to be addressed in order to gain an accurate understanding of what God is saying in this chapter. In the King James Version and the New King James Version of the Bible, the word "firmament" is used in verses 6, 7, 8, 14, 15, 17, and 20. Firmament is an old-english word used to convey the idea of "firmness." Atheists point out to this all the time. For example, Rational Wiki, the Atheistic Encyclopedia says, "The Firmament is a vast, solid [dome] upon which God affixed the stars." [1] But according to Hebrew scholar W.E. Vine, "The Hebrew word [for firmament], has no such meaning [of a solid dome], but denoted the 'expanse' that which is stretched out." [2] So the Hebrew word for firmament doesn't mean a solid dome, but a stretched out expanse. That is why modern Bibles like the ESV and NASB use the word, "expanse." But it also denotes stretching. Genesis 1:2 says, "The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters." (ESV). That shows that when God originally created the world, it was a ball of water. Land wasn't created until day three of creation, so the earth was a big ball of water in space. Then, in Genesis 1:7-8, we are told, "Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. So the evening and the morning were the second day." (NKJV). So the firmament, or expanse was created on day two of the creation week. The firmament implies a stretching in the Hebrew. According to verse 7, God created an expanse or firmament in the midst of the waters on the earth, and stretched it out. According to the Bible, this stretching of the expanse separated the water into two sections: waters under the expanse, and waters above the expanse. This agrees with the canopy theory of creation. The canopy theory suggests that on Day 2, God stretched out the expanse, which is the atmosphere, and produced water above the atmosphere around the earth.
The stretching of the firmament to separate the waters above from the waters below.
This water in space would have probably been super cooled ice. Dr. Carl Baugh has shown scientific evidence that super cool ice has magnetic properties. You can visit his website at www.creationevidence.org. The earth is like a big magnet. There is a property in magnetic fields called, "The Meissner Effect." When you put one magnet on top of another one with equal poles, one will float on top of the other. The ice canopy would have acted as a magnet and floated around the earth from the Meissner effect. This canopy was probably 10-20 inches thick. The canopy theory explains how people before the flood lived to be over 900 years old as described in the genealogies of Genesis. It would have acted as a filter to allow sunlight, but would block harmful UV light and X-rays from the sun, among other radiation from the sun. It would have also acted as a greenhouse to keep in heat and produce a warm temperature. The earth before the flood probably had no tilt, and therefore the temperature would have been uniform throughout the earth. This explains why there are fossils of giant animals, insects, and people, since the canopy provided longevity. I believe the Bible supports the canopy theory, especially the fact that the firmament, or expanse in Hebrew implies a stretching. The firmament is our atmosphere according to the Bible, which separated the ice canopy above from the rest of the world on day 2, which was still water. But Genesis 1:14-15 says, "Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years; and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so." (NKJV). The Bible says that the stars are in the firmament of heaven. If the firmament is the atmosphere, then why does the Bible say that stars are there? The stars are in outer space, not the atmosphere. So is the firmament the atmosphere? Yes and No. This goes into the subject of the words, "heaven," and "heavens." According to the Bible, there are three heavens. The first heaven is the atmosphere (see Genesis 1:7-8). The second heaven is outer space (see Genesis 1:14-15). The third heaven is where God lives (2 Corinthians 12:2). With these three heavens, lets look at Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." (ESV). But wait a second. The first heaven, our atmosphere, wasn't created until the next day. The Bible makes it clear that at this time, probably only the second heaven, outer space, was created in this verse. But why does it say, "heavens"? The Hebrew word for heavens plural is, "shamayim." But it's also the word used in Genesis 1:8, where it says, "And God called the expanse Heaven [singular]..." (ESV). So the same Hebrew word can be either singular or plural based on the context of the passage. The context is that on day one, God created the earth and heaven #2 (outer space). Then God created heaven #1 (the atmosphere) after that. Psalm 148:3-4 says, "Praise Him, sun and moon; Praise Him, all you stars of light! Praise Him, you heavens of heavens, And you waters above the heavens!" (ESV). This tells us that above the heavens which contains the stars (heaven #2), there is water. There is probably water above outer space. Just like outer space was above the waters above the atmosphere, it is a possibility that heaven #3 (where God lives) is beyond another canopy of water around outer space. If this is true, then on day one, God created heaven #2 (outer space), then he stretched out heaven #1 (our atmosphere) and divided outer space into two heavens: outer space, and heaven #3 (where God lives). So based on context, inference, and the flexibility of this Hebrew word, when Genesis 1:1 says heavens, it should be singular. The next verse in this chapter with the word, "heavens" (plural) is verse 9, "And God said, “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear.”" (ESV). The heavens (plural) would include both the atmosphere, outer space, and where God lives. Since there was water above the atmosphere, and maybe still water above outer space, if in this verse "heavens" is plural, then that means that the waters above outer space, and the ice canopy would according to this verse, "be gathered together into one place, [to let] the dry land appear." But this is obviously only referring to the water on the surface of the earth. Remember, the earth was originally a ball of water. This makes no sense if the word "heavens" is plural. It makes a lot of sense if the word "heavens" is singular in this verse, because then it would only be referring to heaven #1 (our atmosphere). So in Genesis 1:9, "heavens" is singular. Genesis 1:14-17 says, "Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years; and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so. Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also. God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth," (NKJV). This is when God created the stars. The stars are in outer space (heaven #2), not in the other heavens (1 and 3). So instead of "heavens" plural, it should have "heavens" singular. Genesis 1:20 says, "Then God said, “Let the waters abound with an abundance of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the face of the firmament of the heavens.”" (NKJV). This verse says that birds fly across the face or surface of the firmament of the heavens (plural). Notice it doesn't say the birds fly inside the firmament of the heavens, but across the surface of it. This conclusion is also supported by the Hebrew language, "paniym," which literally means, "face." The birds do fly inside heaven #1 (our atmosphere), NOT across the surface of it. So "heavens" should be singular, and only referring to heaven #2 (outer space). But why would it say that birds fly across the face of heaven #2? How could there be a surface to outer space? Because on day two, God created a solid ice canopy over the earth. So in reality, the ice canopy is solid, and does have a surface. The birds would have flown underneath this canopy. So the birds literally would be flying under the "surface" of outer space. So all of the "heavens" in Genesis chapter one should be changed to singular based on context and the flexibility of the Hebrew word for "heavens." The only English translations that do that is the King James Version and earlier translations. But they all have the word, "firmament," instead of "expanse," like it should and like the modern versions do. Furthermore, the Bible says that there is a "firmament" of outer space (see Genesis 1:14-17). Since "firmament" in the Hebrew means "expanse," and since there are different heavens, there are two different expanses: the one for the atmosphere, and the one in outer space. Some have mistakenly thought of the firmament of outer space and of the atmosphere as the same firmament. This would support the idea that the firmament is a solid dome. But these are two different firmaments in two different heavens. So the word "firmament" or "expanse" in Genesis 1:14-17 should be referred to as a different expanse or area of space to eliminate confusion. Also, in some Bible versions like NASB, when it comes to the days of creation it always refers to them as, "one day," "a second day," "a third day," etc. That's what is says in the Hebrew, but in the Hebrew, there is a definitive sense of the words, "'echad yowm". This combination implies a definite article when translating into the English language. This is one way how the Hebrew language produced a definitive voice. So it shouldn't say, "one day," but instead, "the first day," like the ESV and the KJV has. With all of those translation issues in mind, this is how Genesis 1 should read in light of context and the Hebrew language:

"1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters. 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day. 6 And God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” 7 And God made the expanse and separated the waters that were under the expanse from the waters that were above the expanse. And it was so. 8 And God called the expanse Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day. 9 And God said, “Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together He called Seas. And God saw that it was good. 11 And God said, “Let the earth sprout vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind, on the earth.” And it was so. 12 The earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed according to their own kinds, and trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening and there was morning, the third day. 14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the space of the heaven to separate the day from the night. And let them be for signs and for seasons, and for days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the space of the heaven to give light upon the earth.” And it was so. 16 And God made the two great lights – the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night – and the stars. 17 And God set them in the space of the heaven to give light on the earth, 18 to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day. 20 And God said, “Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures and birds that may fly above the earth under the surface of the space of heaven.” 21 So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, which the waters brought forth, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 And God blessed them, saying, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.” 23 And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day. 24 And God said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds – livestock and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds.” And it was so. 25 And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds, and the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heaven and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heaven and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. 30 And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heaven and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so. 31 And God saw everything that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day."

References
2. Vine's Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words, 1981 Edition, p. 67.

Blinded by the Bible?

Google+ user Stephen Borsi said to me, "You sir are lost, blinded by your bible. There are museums full of millions upon millions of fossils. There is even a museum in the Smithsonian dedicated to human evolution."

There ARE museums full of fossils, but no fossil counts as evidence for evolution. If you find a bone in the dirt, all you know is it died. You can't prove any fossil had any kids that lived. And why do you think that a fossil in the dirt can do animals today can't do - produce something other than their kind? Also, there are no transitional forms connecting one kind of animal into another. There may be a human evolution display at the museum, but there is no scientific evidence of their belief that humans evolved from a rock 3 billion years ago. Actually, the Bible doesn't blind, it shows the truth of our origins. Genesis 1:1 says, "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth."

The Unshakeable Course is coming soon! For more info, visit www.oddinterviews.com/unshakeable/


Friday, February 21, 2014

Unshakeable Course - NEW TRAILER!

Today, I created a new trailer for my 13-part Unshakeable Course that is coming soon!

Project Frontlines

Today, I along with others, including Patty Nymeyer, went to Redlands East Valley High School protesting against abortion and promoting the gospel and the pro-life cause.
We were following the instructions of Project Frontlines. We gave away lots of cards about abortion with links to the gospel. We also held up signs and engaged people in conversations. Pray for these high schoolers to repent and trust in Christ.

Please visit www.ProjectFrontlines.com for more info on reaching out to high schools with the pro-life message.‬

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Unshakeable Update - 50 views...IN ONE WEEK!

Just one week ago, I posted a trailer on YouTube for my Unshakeable Course Coming Soon.


In just one week, the trailer has 50 views! Keep pushing the number higher by sharing it on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Reddit, etc.